The real annoying thing about Opus 4.6/Codex 5.3 is that it’s impossible to publicly say “Opus 4.5 (and the models that came after it) are an order of magnitude better than coding LLMs released just months before it” without sounding like an AI hype booster clickbaiting, but it’s the counterintuitive truth to my personal frustration. I have been trying to break this damn model by giving it complex tasks that would take me months to do by myself despite my coding pedigree but Opus and Codex keep doing them correctly. On Hacker News I was accused of said clickbaiting when making a similar statement with accusations of “I haven’t had success with Opus 4.5 so you must be lying.” The remedy to this skepticism is to provide more evidence in addition to greater checks and balances, but what can you do if people refuse to believe your evidence?
圖像來源，Serenity Strull/ BBC
，这一点在WPS下载最新地址中也有详细论述
How did Paramount beat Netflix to Warner Bros?
最后再强调一遍：蒸馏有用，但没有你们想象的那么有用。
据《The Verge》报道，Anthropic 昨天发布了 Claude Cowork 的重大升级，正式将这一面向知识工作者的 AI 工具推向企业级应用场景。